Skip to main content
White Boy Shuffle is funny. When the first line of the entire book threw around a level 3 expletive like it was nothing, I knew automatically that I would love it. Granted, the expletive in question is a super gross and misogynistic one, but for some reason I was kind of okay with it in this context. Maybe I'm wrong for that - let me know. But either way, the humor throughout the book is exactly the kind of humor that I love. It sarcastic and dry but at the same time it's fun. It's exaggerated and unrealistic, but it knows that and it doesn't care. It doesn't take itself too seriously, but it it's also conscious - it calls out things that are important, like police brutality or the issues with "multicultural" education. It sometimes feels like Beatty is writing just to write or like he gets caught up in his own imagination. The book is filled with details that are just unnecessary - it seems like their only function is to screw with us. But that's what makes it so funny to me. I usually take notes in the margins when I read books for school, and so far my notes in this book have consisted entirely of 'LOL's and 'lmao's.

The humor of the book is probably the most obvious aspect, and thus far in class it's been pretty well established. At the same time as it's light-hearted and fun though, there are some parts of the book that are uncharacteristically dark and these are parts we haven't really talked too much about yet.

The first scene I'm thinking about is the brief mention we get of Gunnar's experience with molestation as a little kid. It's in chapter two, where he's describing different colors and what they mean to him. Under the color "black" Gunnar describes being sexually assaulted by his drunk father. It's heartbreaking for a number of reasons (that he's such a small child, that it's his literal father, that it's happening at all), but one of the things that stuck out to me was the fact that it's his father's "weekend custody" (pg. 36). It's his father's weekend - it's supposed to be a time for them to bond. Whether or not he wants to spend time with his father is questionable, since he seems almost to be ashamed of him, but the point is, he doesn't see his father every day, and when he does he gets molested. I guess maybe it's part of why we're supposed to understand that Gunnar's time at Hillside is so important; it gives him a chance to redefine what "black" means to him. Instead of "black" being molestation and trauma, at Hillside it becomes companionship, even friendship (ex. when Scoby calls him the n word for the first time).

But chapter two isn't the only place that Beatty does this - even in Hillside Gunnar falls victim to sexual assault when Betty and Veronica literally rape him. It's never described as what it is though (rape!), and if Gunnar has any reaction at all, it seems almost positive. He walks home singing. Are we supposed to believe he liked it and so therefore it's insignificant? I'm honestly not sure. And just recently we saw Gunnar get brutally beaten by (if I understood it correctly at least) his own father - the same one who molested him as a kid. He almost dies at the hand of his father's "nightstick" and yet, this fact is mentioned only in passing.

To readers it seems like all these things should be a huge deal - like they should come back to haunt Gunnar or impact the outcome of the rest of the book. But they don't. After each incident the chapter and Gunnar's life immediately move on, and there's no more mention of it. Beatty throws us some really dark, twisted stuff in White Boy Shuffle, but just as quickly as it enters, it's gone.

Comments

  1. I'm also really confused about those scenes in the novel. One minute I'm laughing, the next I'm like oh my god this is gonna affect him for the rest of his life. But then Beatty never brings it up again. It's almost the opposite of "Beloved," in that the past seems almost eerily absent from Gunnar's present.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

We’ve mentioned the ‘yam scene’ a few times in class, but we haven’t quite gotten to it yet so it’s pretty much uncharted territory for the moment. I think it’s a super important scene for a lot of reasons, but the most important one is the sense of freedom that the yams bring the narrator. He leaves Mary’s house needing a breath of fresh air and a break from his inner turmoil, and the yams end up bringing him a huge deal of clarification. He says immediately after eating the yams that he is “overcome by an intense feeling of freedom” and I don’t think that he’s truly experienced this feeling yet in the book (pg 264). I was definitely a little confused at first – that eating yams from the street can inspire an inner revelation in someone seems pretty weird – but then I thought about all the times that I’ve gone somewhere on my own, or bought something on my own and I understood a little better. Being in a situation where you answer entirely to yourself and everything you do is on
The scene that takes place in Emma Goldman's home in Chapter 9 was one that I found really interesting, but also a little bit conflicting. To begin with,  Emma Goldman gives Evelyn a powerful lecture about liberating herself from the manipulations and abuses of men; of embracing real love and the freedom that comes with it. Great, I thought, it's about time someone sets Evelyn straight (or, maybe not  straight , exactly). The best part is that Emma is just so right. Evelyn's worth has, up until this point been defined solely by her relation to powerful men - men who abused her both physically and sexually. Her sexuality has been on constant display for all of America to debate. As such, th ere's something really empowering in Evelyn experiencing this sexuality with someone  who, for once, doesn't view her worth as existing within a restricted domain; someone who doesn't view her beauty as existing within the corset that she wears.  The scene is, overall, one whi
During the very first Mumbo Jumbo reading, I was really interested by Reed's comparison of the 20th century to a giant "Age Race" (pg 20) because the analogy gives a lot of insight into the greater context of Jes Grew's growth during the time period. He basically describes the time period as a time when many different trends are vying to be the one which is remembered at the end of the era. Everyone is competing to be the face of the 20th century. He continues, saying, "Now imagine this Age Race occurring before a crowd of society idlers you would expect to find at 1 of those blue-ribbon dog shows." It's pretty obvious that this refers to privileged white people - becoming part of mainstream culture is a contest, and white people are the judges. At first though, white people aren't too into the Jes Grew craze, because it's outlandish and scandalous. Black culture is the "hound mongrel" next to pekinese and collies. What's interest