Skip to main content
I had heard of  Sorry to Bother You prior to watching it in class, and I thought it seemed really cool if a little weird, but I was never expecting it to be what it ended up being - it was seriously one of the biggest mind trips that I have experienced watching any movie. As a lot of people have already talked about, what made it so insane was the fact that it started out fairly normal. Sure, it seemed a little bit off, but the world that Cash enters as soon as he is promoted completely changes everything. I looked the movie up on Wikipedia because I was curious as to what the general reception was, and it seems to have been really well received, which doesn't surprise me because regardless of how absurd it is, it was still objectively a really great film. What really interested me though, is something Boots Riley said, which is that the movie is not actually meant to specifically critique the Trump administration. I don't think I was ever necessarily under the impression that the film was specifically targeting the Trump administration, although in the current political climate, I can totally see how it might be. But, Riley wrote the film a while ago during the Obama administration, so his criticism really doesn't have much to do with the party in power. We actually see in the film - the politicians are shown to just enable Worry Free and the "write to your elected officials" line is used with disdain, suggesting that the politicians really won't do much. So it's a much broader criticism of capitalism, and it speaks to the fact that, even under progressive administrations who might share some of Riley's ideas, the issue is with the entire system. Interestingly, there was apparently a line in the movie that said, "Worry Free is making America great again" even before Trump started using this line as his campaign slogan. They ended up taking out this line to avoid the film coming across as a form of protest specific to Trump's administration. I thought that was really interesting - its important to understand that the corporations in place which dehumanize and degrade hoards of people are only part of a greater capitalist system. When we only attribute it to a specific political party, I think this can lead to situations where we come to accept the same problem when we are in support of the administration, ignoring the fact that the same systems are in place and continuing to cause harm.

Comments

  1. I think you're right that the movie isn't pointing out problems with one organization but rather with the whole system, which is why I feel like the film is so powerful. It causes you to take a good look at everything you live with.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

We’ve mentioned the ‘yam scene’ a few times in class, but we haven’t quite gotten to it yet so it’s pretty much uncharted territory for the moment. I think it’s a super important scene for a lot of reasons, but the most important one is the sense of freedom that the yams bring the narrator. He leaves Mary’s house needing a breath of fresh air and a break from his inner turmoil, and the yams end up bringing him a huge deal of clarification. He says immediately after eating the yams that he is “overcome by an intense feeling of freedom” and I don’t think that he’s truly experienced this feeling yet in the book (pg 264). I was definitely a little confused at first – that eating yams from the street can inspire an inner revelation in someone seems pretty weird – but then I thought about all the times that I’ve gone somewhere on my own, or bought something on my own and I understood a little better. Being in a situation where you answer entirely to yourself and everything you do is on
The scene that takes place in Emma Goldman's home in Chapter 9 was one that I found really interesting, but also a little bit conflicting. To begin with,  Emma Goldman gives Evelyn a powerful lecture about liberating herself from the manipulations and abuses of men; of embracing real love and the freedom that comes with it. Great, I thought, it's about time someone sets Evelyn straight (or, maybe not  straight , exactly). The best part is that Emma is just so right. Evelyn's worth has, up until this point been defined solely by her relation to powerful men - men who abused her both physically and sexually. Her sexuality has been on constant display for all of America to debate. As such, th ere's something really empowering in Evelyn experiencing this sexuality with someone  who, for once, doesn't view her worth as existing within a restricted domain; someone who doesn't view her beauty as existing within the corset that she wears.  The scene is, overall, one whi
During the very first Mumbo Jumbo reading, I was really interested by Reed's comparison of the 20th century to a giant "Age Race" (pg 20) because the analogy gives a lot of insight into the greater context of Jes Grew's growth during the time period. He basically describes the time period as a time when many different trends are vying to be the one which is remembered at the end of the era. Everyone is competing to be the face of the 20th century. He continues, saying, "Now imagine this Age Race occurring before a crowd of society idlers you would expect to find at 1 of those blue-ribbon dog shows." It's pretty obvious that this refers to privileged white people - becoming part of mainstream culture is a contest, and white people are the judges. At first though, white people aren't too into the Jes Grew craze, because it's outlandish and scandalous. Black culture is the "hound mongrel" next to pekinese and collies. What's interest