Skip to main content
White Boy Shuffle is funny. When the first line of the entire book threw around a level 3 expletive like it was nothing, I knew automatically that I would love it. Granted, the expletive in question is a super gross and misogynistic one, but for some reason I was kind of okay with it in this context. Maybe I'm wrong for that - let me know. But either way, the humor throughout the book is exactly the kind of humor that I love. It sarcastic and dry but at the same time it's fun. It's exaggerated and unrealistic, but it knows that and it doesn't care. It doesn't take itself too seriously, but it it's also conscious - it calls out things that are important, like police brutality or the issues with "multicultural" education. It sometimes feels like Beatty is writing just to write or like he gets caught up in his own imagination. The book is filled with details that are just unnecessary - it seems like their only function is to screw with us. But that's what makes it so funny to me. I usually take notes in the margins when I read books for school, and so far my notes in this book have consisted entirely of 'LOL's and 'lmao's.

The humor of the book is probably the most obvious aspect, and thus far in class it's been pretty well established. At the same time as it's light-hearted and fun though, there are some parts of the book that are uncharacteristically dark and these are parts we haven't really talked too much about yet.

The first scene I'm thinking about is the brief mention we get of Gunnar's experience with molestation as a little kid. It's in chapter two, where he's describing different colors and what they mean to him. Under the color "black" Gunnar describes being sexually assaulted by his drunk father. It's heartbreaking for a number of reasons (that he's such a small child, that it's his literal father, that it's happening at all), but one of the things that stuck out to me was the fact that it's his father's "weekend custody" (pg. 36). It's his father's weekend - it's supposed to be a time for them to bond. Whether or not he wants to spend time with his father is questionable, since he seems almost to be ashamed of him, but the point is, he doesn't see his father every day, and when he does he gets molested. I guess maybe it's part of why we're supposed to understand that Gunnar's time at Hillside is so important; it gives him a chance to redefine what "black" means to him. Instead of "black" being molestation and trauma, at Hillside it becomes companionship, even friendship (ex. when Scoby calls him the n word for the first time).

But chapter two isn't the only place that Beatty does this - even in Hillside Gunnar falls victim to sexual assault when Betty and Veronica literally rape him. It's never described as what it is though (rape!), and if Gunnar has any reaction at all, it seems almost positive. He walks home singing. Are we supposed to believe he liked it and so therefore it's insignificant? I'm honestly not sure. And just recently we saw Gunnar get brutally beaten by (if I understood it correctly at least) his own father - the same one who molested him as a kid. He almost dies at the hand of his father's "nightstick" and yet, this fact is mentioned only in passing.

To readers it seems like all these things should be a huge deal - like they should come back to haunt Gunnar or impact the outcome of the rest of the book. But they don't. After each incident the chapter and Gunnar's life immediately move on, and there's no more mention of it. Beatty throws us some really dark, twisted stuff in White Boy Shuffle, but just as quickly as it enters, it's gone.

Comments

  1. I'm also really confused about those scenes in the novel. One minute I'm laughing, the next I'm like oh my god this is gonna affect him for the rest of his life. But then Beatty never brings it up again. It's almost the opposite of "Beloved," in that the past seems almost eerily absent from Gunnar's present.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I probably shouldn’t be admitting this- but I actually have yet to finish Slaughterhouse-Five. I still have the last chapter left, but so far, I have counted exactly 77 instances of “so it goes.” I found the continued usage of this phrase really interesting because it just kept coming back – sometimes every paragraph on a page ended in “so it goes.” When I started looking for a theme which tied all the instances together, the only thing I noticed was that it was usually at the end of passages, and much less often in the middle of passages. As I was looking around at articles for my panel presentation though, I read something which I had never thought about, but which is super obvious now – the “so it goes” always comes after the death of someone or something.               I think that the effect of the “so it goes” relates to the entire book as a whole in the irony and the understatement that comes along with it. Every...
I found Charlotte really interesting as a character because crucial to Mumbo Jumbo Reed is its important commentary on cultural appropriation, and Charlotte is one of the most blatant depictions of this phenomenon, especially as it relates to black music and dance. She learns the "The Work" from Papa LaBas, but she then quits and goes on to profit from what she has learned, despite LaBas's protests that "you shouldn't attempt to use any aspect of The Work for profit" (pg 52). The first sentences of Chapter 28 summarize Charlotte's situation well: "Charlotte has struck it wealthy with her Plantation House routine. She possesses a richly endowed apartment as a result of her ability to Stop the Show." Not only is Charlotte - a white woman - gaining success doing the same things that black people are villainized for, but she is doing it with a "Plantation House routine." In short, she is profiting off the oppression of black people and ...
During the very first Mumbo Jumbo reading, I was really interested by Reed's comparison of the 20th century to a giant "Age Race" (pg 20) because the analogy gives a lot of insight into the greater context of Jes Grew's growth during the time period. He basically describes the time period as a time when many different trends are vying to be the one which is remembered at the end of the era. Everyone is competing to be the face of the 20th century. He continues, saying, "Now imagine this Age Race occurring before a crowd of society idlers you would expect to find at 1 of those blue-ribbon dog shows." It's pretty obvious that this refers to privileged white people - becoming part of mainstream culture is a contest, and white people are the judges. At first though, white people aren't too into the Jes Grew craze, because it's outlandish and scandalous. Black culture is the "hound mongrel" next to pekinese and collies. What's interest...