I had heard of Sorry to Bother You prior to watching it in class, and I thought it seemed really cool if a little weird, but I was never expecting it to be what it ended up being - it was seriously one of the biggest mind trips that I have experienced watching any movie. As a lot of people have already talked about, what made it so insane was the fact that it started out fairly normal. Sure, it seemed a little bit off, but the world that Cash enters as soon as he is promoted completely changes everything. I looked the movie up on Wikipedia because I was curious as to what the general reception was, and it seems to have been really well received, which doesn't surprise me because regardless of how absurd it is, it was still objectively a really great film. What really interested me though, is something Boots Riley said, which is that the movie is not actually meant to specifically critique the Trump administration. I don't think I was ever necessarily under the impression that the film was specifically targeting the Trump administration, although in the current political climate, I can totally see how it might be. But, Riley wrote the film a while ago during the Obama administration, so his criticism really doesn't have much to do with the party in power. We actually see in the film - the politicians are shown to just enable Worry Free and the "write to your elected officials" line is used with disdain, suggesting that the politicians really won't do much. So it's a much broader criticism of capitalism, and it speaks to the fact that, even under progressive administrations who might share some of Riley's ideas, the issue is with the entire system. Interestingly, there was apparently a line in the movie that said, "Worry Free is making America great again" even before Trump started using this line as his campaign slogan. They ended up taking out this line to avoid the film coming across as a form of protest specific to Trump's administration. I thought that was really interesting - its important to understand that the corporations in place which dehumanize and degrade hoards of people are only part of a greater capitalist system. When we only attribute it to a specific political party, I think this can lead to situations where we come to accept the same problem when we are in support of the administration, ignoring the fact that the same systems are in place and continuing to cause harm.
I probably shouldn’t be admitting this- but I actually have yet to finish Slaughterhouse-Five. I still have the last chapter left, but so far, I have counted exactly 77 instances of “so it goes.” I found the continued usage of this phrase really interesting because it just kept coming back – sometimes every paragraph on a page ended in “so it goes.” When I started looking for a theme which tied all the instances together, the only thing I noticed was that it was usually at the end of passages, and much less often in the middle of passages. As I was looking around at articles for my panel presentation though, I read something which I had never thought about, but which is super obvious now – the “so it goes” always comes after the death of someone or something. I think that the effect of the “so it goes” relates to the entire book as a whole in the irony and the understatement that comes along with it. Every...
I think you're right that the movie isn't pointing out problems with one organization but rather with the whole system, which is why I feel like the film is so powerful. It causes you to take a good look at everything you live with.
ReplyDelete