Skip to main content
I had heard of  Sorry to Bother You prior to watching it in class, and I thought it seemed really cool if a little weird, but I was never expecting it to be what it ended up being - it was seriously one of the biggest mind trips that I have experienced watching any movie. As a lot of people have already talked about, what made it so insane was the fact that it started out fairly normal. Sure, it seemed a little bit off, but the world that Cash enters as soon as he is promoted completely changes everything. I looked the movie up on Wikipedia because I was curious as to what the general reception was, and it seems to have been really well received, which doesn't surprise me because regardless of how absurd it is, it was still objectively a really great film. What really interested me though, is something Boots Riley said, which is that the movie is not actually meant to specifically critique the Trump administration. I don't think I was ever necessarily under the impression that the film was specifically targeting the Trump administration, although in the current political climate, I can totally see how it might be. But, Riley wrote the film a while ago during the Obama administration, so his criticism really doesn't have much to do with the party in power. We actually see in the film - the politicians are shown to just enable Worry Free and the "write to your elected officials" line is used with disdain, suggesting that the politicians really won't do much. So it's a much broader criticism of capitalism, and it speaks to the fact that, even under progressive administrations who might share some of Riley's ideas, the issue is with the entire system. Interestingly, there was apparently a line in the movie that said, "Worry Free is making America great again" even before Trump started using this line as his campaign slogan. They ended up taking out this line to avoid the film coming across as a form of protest specific to Trump's administration. I thought that was really interesting - its important to understand that the corporations in place which dehumanize and degrade hoards of people are only part of a greater capitalist system. When we only attribute it to a specific political party, I think this can lead to situations where we come to accept the same problem when we are in support of the administration, ignoring the fact that the same systems are in place and continuing to cause harm.

Comments

  1. I think you're right that the movie isn't pointing out problems with one organization but rather with the whole system, which is why I feel like the film is so powerful. It causes you to take a good look at everything you live with.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

We’ve mentioned the ‘yam scene’ a few times in class, but we haven’t quite gotten to it yet so it’s pretty much uncharted territory for the moment. I think it’s a super important scene for a lot of reasons, but the most important one is the sense of freedom that the yams bring the narrator. He leaves Mary’s house needing a breath of fresh air and a break from his inner turmoil, and the yams end up bringing him a huge deal of clarification. He says immediately after eating the yams that he is “overcome by an intense feeling of freedom” and I don’t think that he’s truly experienced this feeling yet in the book (pg 264). I was definitely a little confused at first – that eating yams from the street can inspire an inner revelation in someone seems pretty weird – but then I thought about all the times that I’ve gone somewhere on my own, or bought something on my own and I understood a little better. Being in a situation where you answer entirely to yourself and everything you do is on
I probably shouldn’t be admitting this- but I actually have yet to finish Slaughterhouse-Five. I still have the last chapter left, but so far, I have counted exactly 77 instances of “so it goes.” I found the continued usage of this phrase really interesting because it just kept coming back – sometimes every paragraph on a page ended in “so it goes.” When I started looking for a theme which tied all the instances together, the only thing I noticed was that it was usually at the end of passages, and much less often in the middle of passages. As I was looking around at articles for my panel presentation though, I read something which I had never thought about, but which is super obvious now – the “so it goes” always comes after the death of someone or something.               I think that the effect of the “so it goes” relates to the entire book as a whole in the irony and the understatement that comes along with it. Every time someone dies, Vonnegut interjects to say – yeah, maybe thi
As we finish our discussion of Invisible Man  I wanted to write about one of my favorite chapters in the book - Chapter Three, the Golden Day chapter. As chaotic as it is, I love the idea of the Golden Day; it's an isolated part of society where ordinary social norms and hierarchies don't apply. As soon as Mr. Norton walks in, he is ridiculed and mocked by the patients. They call him Thomas Jefferson and John D. Rockefeller and make other jokes that importantly, are at his expense. We talked a lot in class about how important laughter and humor are in Invisible Man - they function most often as a means of undermining someone's authority or importance. Specifically, the jokes that compare Mr. Norton to any other white guy are powerful because they basically send the message that Mr. Norton is of little importance or concern to the patients. He might as well be any other person and in that sense the patients' jokes really serve as the first warning that something is diffe